摘要
随着电动汽车的快速发展,动力电池荷电状态(SOC)的精确估计对整车能量管理、续驶里程预测及防止过充/过放至关重要。为了提高锂电池SOC估计精度,构建了一种基于分数阶理论的等效电路模型,并采用自适应遗忘因子递推最小二乘算法(adaptive forgetting factor recursive least square,AFFRLS)对模型参数进行辨识。针对传统无迹卡尔曼滤波(unscented Kalman filter,UKF)在动态工况下因单新息框架导致数据利用率低与抗扰性不足的问题,提出结合分数阶模型长记忆特性需求的多新息无迹卡尔曼滤波算法(fractional order multipleinformation
unscented Kalman filter,FOMIUKF)。通过MATLAB搭建仿真模型,并与扩展卡尔曼滤波(extended Kalman filter,EKF)算法和无迹卡尔曼滤波算法进行比较,结果表明,基于FOMIUKF算法的SOC估计平均误差为0.78%,其精度比EKF算法提高了0.42%,比UKF算法提高了0.25%。
Abstract
With the rapid development of electric vehicles, the
accurate estimation for the state of charge (SOC) of power battery is crucial
for vehicle energy management, range prediction and prevention of
overcharge/overdischarge. In order to improve the estimation accuracy of
lithium battery SOC, an equivalent circuit model was constructed based on the
fractional order theory, and the model parameters were identified by using the
adaptive forgetting factor recursive least square (AFFRLS) algorithm. In order
to solve the problem of low data utilization and insufficient noise immunity
caused by the single unscented Kalman filter (UKF) under dynamic conditions, a
fractional order multiple-information unscented Kalman filter
(FOMIUKF) algorithm was proposed by combining with the requirements of the long
memory characteristics of fractional order model. The simulation model was
built by MATLAB and compared with the extended Kalman filter (EKF) algorithm
and UKF algorithm. The results showed that the average error of SOC estimation
based on FOMIUKF algorithm was 0.78%, which was 0.42% higher than that of EKF
algorithm and 0.25% higher than that of UKF algorithm.
关键词
锂离子电池 /
荷电状态 /
估计 /
分数阶理论 /
多新息理论 /
无迹卡尔曼滤波
Key words
lithium-ion battery /
state of
charge /
estimation /
fractional order theory /
multiple innovation theory /
unscented
Kalman filter
唐俊, 张心静, 王喆, 徐立浩.
基于FOMIUKF的锂离子电池SOC估计[J]. 车用发动机. 2026, 0(1): 81-87
TANG Jun, ZHANG Xinjing, WANG Zhe, XU Lihao.
SOC Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on FOMIUKF[J]. Vehicle Engine. 2026, 0(1): 81-87
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}