摘要
在发动机测试台架上对比研究不同温度、空速、氨氮比下铜基分子筛SCR催化剂和钒基SCR催化剂的NOx转化效率和氨存储特性。试验结果表明,对于铜基SCR催化剂,在低温区域200~250 ℃,温度对氮氧转化率影响明显,而空速影响甚微。温度对氨储存量影响极大,铜基SCR催化剂氨存储量随温度上升而快速下降,200 ℃时为1.5 g/L, 250 ℃为0.77 g/L。对比而言,铜基催化剂低温性能优异,转化效率达到84%,明显高于钒基催化剂低温40%~60%转化效率;中温段(250~450 ℃)性能稳定,转化效率达到98%;高温段(450 ℃以上)效率较高,达到96%,且随着温度升高效率降低幅度较小。铜基分子筛催化剂性能整体优于钒基催化剂,从技术角度考虑,为国六后处理催化剂的优先选择。本试验研究工作获得的基础数据,可用于发动机数据标定。
Abstract
The bench test was conducted to investigate NOx conversion efficiency and NH3 storage characteristics of copper-based molecular sieve and vanadium-based SCR catalysts under different temperatures, space velocities and ANRs. The results showed that the low temperature area between 200 ℃ and 250 ℃ had an obvious effect on NOx conversion and the space velocity had little influence for copperbased SCR catalyst. In addition, temperature had a remarkable influence on NH3 storage amount, and the NH3 storage amount of copper-based SCR catalyst decreased rapidly with the increase of temperature. NH3 storage amount was 1.5 g/L at 200 ℃, but decreased to 0.77 g/L at 250 ℃. Compared with vanadium-based catalyst with 40%-60% conversion rate at low temperature, copper-based catalyst showed much better low-temperature performance with conversion efficiency up to 84%. Besides, copper-based catalyst had stable performance with conversion efficiency of 98% at middle temperature about 250 ℃ to 450 ℃ and could also achieve conversion efficiency of 96% at high temperature higher than 450 ℃, and the decrease scope of conversion efficiency for copper-based catalyst is minor with the increase of temperature. Accordingly, copper-based molecular sieve catalyst had better performance than vanadium-based catalyst, which should be the priority choice for the posttreatment of China Ⅵ diesel engine from a technical point of view. The basic data obtained in this test study could be used to calibrate the engine.
关键词
重型柴油机 /
选择性催化还原 /
催化剂 /
台架试验 /
转化效率 /
氨存储
Key words
heavy-duty diesel engine /
SCR /
catalyst /
bench test /
conversion efficiency /
ammonia storage
王奉双,侯亚玲,高伟,王远景,郎俊宇,冯刚.
国六柴油机用铜基和钒基SCR催化剂特性台架对比研究[J]. 车用发动机. 2020, 0(1): 31 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-2222.2020.01.005
WANG Fengshuang1,2,HOU Yaling1,3,GAO Wei1,2,WANG Yuanjing1,2,〖JZ〗LANG Junyu1,2,FENG Gang1,3.
Comparison between Copper-Based and Vanadium-Based SCR Catalyst of China Ⅵ Diesel Engine Based on Bench Test[J]. Vehicle Engine. 2020, 0(1): 31 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-2222.2020.01.005
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}